sexta-feira, 10 de novembro de 2017

And if ... Metrify

d''/t't'' = ((v'+v'')/(1+ (v'*v'')/(c^(2)))+ (4wr)/(π sqrt(1-w^(2)r^(2)c^(2)))) * (((2π-λ)/λ)*(a)

at where:

λ = constant of feigenbaum
a =  Kerr-Newmann metric (radius of the major axis of the ergosphere ellipsoid for charged objects)
c = speed of light
w = angular velocity in radiating of the object to be calculated in relation to the other object of the correlation.
r = radius of the object to be calculated
v = resulting speed
v '= linear velocity of object A in relation to object B
v '' = linear velocity of object B in relation to object A
π = pi
t' = parallel time at angular momentum

Just to travelling ideas.
I may be traveling completely here, but I came to the following conclusion by looking at kerr and newmann in return for the diametric motor, but I would say the following:

As Kerr considers mass and electric charge in his calculations of geometry, and I am not in any way saying that it is wrong. But associated with the fact that photons without charge and mass accelerate, the charge and mass would retard the movement. But how to put this in my equation? I just found this solution here.

And where pi.Maya / λ would be this variation of charge and mass that Kerr and Newmann use and would change the speed result. Of course we would have to accept a new metric.

This is in my opinion and the only way I found to say, yes, although black holes have mass and electric charge, the photons without it accelerate.

I'm going to try to forget this but it's because speed is a dimension for me, for example, I was wondering if I went into the region where time travel is permited by the kerr metric I would have to see a fifth dimension where one of the axes would be speed and another space and finally the time.

Yes, I agree that there is no new metric, it was just high.

The Lorentz factor itself already defines a fifth dimension by itself when it says that time travel is possible when the speed of light is near, unless it does admit what I have said, that the greater the speed the smaller the rotation and vise versa and then the bigger the rotation the more still the object stays, but this is contradictory because even if I make a small-scale rotating machine for it to go to the future it tends to stay still and does not stay because of the movement of other things out of the system and also that André Fuzfa rightly claimed to have designed a time machine that he calls  gravitron leads me to believe even more that there is a fifth dimension, now to go into the future stopped turning a key is also to stand still. But to stand still using his gravitron within the gravity of the earth and it spinning is to believe that v> c has a fifth dimension in that history, and that fifth dimension would be speed itself.


And this equation that I did not invent other than pi.Maya / feingenbaum to link all four-dimensional metrics to try to show this, which is a purely speed equation of "despising" charge and mass that these metrics use since in the diametric motor things get accelerated without charge and without mass, taking the charge and external mass, that is, the photons of the motor did not accelerate because it was a charged optical fiber, it was precisely by a natural and metric phenomenon where the "effective mass" was generated purely by the rotation of the photons.

 I'm not saying that the Lorentz factor is the fifth dimension, I'm saying that speed is the fifth dimension. The factor of lorentz only proves that the greater the speed the greater the time dilation, but to affirm that the time dilates is to affirm that there are two times of the space and this, two times in the same space and this is equal to d/ tt, only that where if it arrives with d / tt if not dd /tt? That is, to affirm that there are 4 dimensions is only an inheritance to say that universe is all that we reach but it is not precisely by the factor of lorentz to assert d / tt as if tt were t² when it is not, it is d / t't'' but d / t't'' is the same as d' /t' versus d''/ t'' 'then we would have two dimensions separated only by velocity dimension.

Now, pi / feigenbaum is approximately 0.67, and if we apply this in the equation we will get values ​​well above c, but if we do an equality with the Kerr-Newman metrics, for example, where you can substitute the M of Maya for the metric of Kerr-Newmann or any other metric accepted or that is correct that considers the charge and mass as interference of the rotation (in the case of photons M = 0), we would have a new metric that we would call Maya metric and in a specific region of the ergosphere where the impulse could exceeds c and a whole new universe would be constructed based on time travel with 5 dimensions, since pi.Maya / feigenbaum adding to the value of that independent equation of the accepted metrics would give a value superior to c, for this reason the relative + -, is the view that the universes are like neighboring rolls with opposite time arrows and we would have 5 simplified or folded dimensions on each other, 1 of speed, 3 of space and 1 of time, but in total n dimensions being 1 of speed 3 for space and n³ of time and n³ because for each time we would have 3 spatial dimensions, forming in total n multiple dimensions of 5, by the simpliest way.


Nenhum comentário: